PtG Comment 13.08.2013

For your eyes only

Currently, the IOC faces great international pressure because of Russia's new, strict anti-gay laws. Andreas Selliaas comments on the situation and on whether the IOC ought to take a greater political responsibility.

At odds with the law 

The strict anti-gay laws in Russia have attracted international attention, but what created the most outrage was when the Russian Sports Minister, Vitaly Mutko, confirmed that gay athletes could risk getting arrested during the Winter Olympics in Sochi.

The British actor Stephen Fry called for prime minister David Cameron’s action against Russia and compared the Russian anti-gay laws with the nazi-regime, and in Norway bartenders have started a boycott of Russian vodka after the news that gay athletes could face prosecution during the Sochi Games.

The international pressure has prompted a reaction from the IOC as the new law is contrary to the Olympic contract agreed upon by Russia and the IOC, stating that discrimination based on sexual orientation is prohibited.

Under pressure by the IOC the Russian authorities have promised that gay athletes will not face prosecution during the Olympics but no such guarantee is provided to protect spectators and foreign visitors. Ordinary Russians must adhere to the law as it is today, also during the Olympics. Could the IOC have put more pressure on Russia?

Don’t ruin the Olympics!

This issue shows how important the Olympics is to the Russians: they comply with IOC demands as long as they can be linked to the Olympics. But it also shows that the IOC and probably also the international community are more interested in controversial issues that affect them in a limited space of time, and not in the general situation in Russia outside the Olympics. The motto almost seems to be “don’t let the gay question ruin the Olympics!”.

Moving on

This attitude is similar to what was prevalent regarding the Beijing Olympics, when the IOC – to their credit – came to an agreement with the Chinese authorities about allowing international press journalists to travel freely around China before, during and a while after the Games (except in Tibet and Xinjiang). This was seen as a breakthrough for the human rights work in China – at least by the IOC – and it did open up for Western insight into China for a limited period.

However, the law only applied to foreign journalists and we saw few protests when this rule was revoked. Western (sports) journalists were already on their way to Sochi via London.

Olympic Stress Disorder

Human Rights Organisations admitted after the Olympics that the Games probably contributed to a worsening of the human rights situation in China. Because of the Olympics? Many of those who hoped that the Olympics would change China for the better have now settled into resignation and instead turn the other cheek in order not to provoke the coming super power for economic reasons. At the same time, they turn their attention away from those who suffer injustice in China. Will we see the same thing happen with Russia after the Sochi Olympics?

FIFA’s role

The debate surrounding the Football World Cup in Qatar in 2022 follows the same path as we have seen with the Beijing and Sochi Olympics. The biggest concern these days is whether the championship should be played in the summer or in the winter. The heat that the players might be exposed to is what matters the most.

Anti-gay legislation and the lack of gender equality are not high on the agenda. These matters might be put up for discussion as the championship approaches, but I am concerned that it will be more about how this affects the championship and less about how Qatar treats its own population. What else can FIFA do? And what happens when Qatar hands in a new application to host the Olympics?

The passive athlete

Should we expect more engagement from the athletes? In the run-up to the Beijing Olympics, several athletes spoke out against the human rights situation in China. The problem was that most of them were either no longer active within their sport or were far from their peak, and thereby risking little from their protests.

It is not only the host nation that can punish political protests during Olympic Games. The IOC also dislikes negative actions and has sanctions in hand should athletes participate in political rallies during the Games. The question now is whether the IOC has the guts to punish athletes who fight for the ideals of the Olympics charter during the Sochi Olympics?

Mock arguments

International sporting events, and especially the Olympics, have a special position in international politics. Very rarely do the national authorities prohibit athletes from enemy nations from entering the country to participate in international events. The mock argument is that one should not mix sports and politics. The truth is that they do not want any negative attention during the Olympics. This provides the international federations and the IOC with great power – a power they until now have used selectively for their own benefit. Should they take greater political responsibility? 

IOC and the United Nations

As the Olympics is the most important sporting event in the world I feel that the IOC should take greater responsibility when choosing host nations. This is particularly important in light of the strong connection that has emerged between the UN and the IOC during the last 15 years.

The Secretary-General of the UN was the flag-bearer during the London Olympics and in the run-up to every Olympics the IOC adopts an Olympic truce in the UN General Assembly. Pretending to be a light-version of the UN, the IOC ought to put greater emphasis on human rights when organising the Olympics in the future.

The political responsibility of the IOC

The IOC can no longer selectively decide whether or not they wish to engage politically in the selection of host countries. It is time that criteria are developed for the applicant cities that also take into consideration the rights of others than those who participate in the Games, such as press freedom for national journalists and non-discrimination of sexual orientation. Only then will we see the degree to which oppressing regimes want to host prestigious games and the true strength of the IOC.


This article first appeared on Andreas Selliaas' blog 'Sportens Uutholdelige Letthet' on 8 August 2013. 

Related articles

Panel at Play the Game 2022.
PtG Article 27.06.2022
Russian sanctions unlikely to herald a new era of accountability
Man presenting at conference
PtG Article 27.06.2022
Saudi Arabia is filling the vacuum after Russia in a year of sportswashing
Stanislav Pozdnyakov
PtG Article 05.04.2022
Most Olympic federations suspend Russian athletes, but officials go free
  Man betting on football
PtG Article 23.03.2022
Russian betting companies continue to sponsor football clubs after invasion
Kamilia Valieva
PtG Comment 22.02.2022
Child athletes are too valuable for the Olympic system to set age limits
PtG Comment 19.01.2022
The political power of the Olympic opening ceremony: Lessons from Beijing and Sochi
Uyghurs demonstrate in Washington
PtG Article 14.10.2021
Beijing 2022: Olympic boycott battle over China’s ‘Genocide Games’
PtG Comment 19.05.2021
Beijing 2022: To the moon and back
Construction workers
PtG Comment 23.02.2021
The unpredictable financial costs of hosting the Olympic Games
Yuriy Ganus
PtG Article 19.01.2021
The character assassination of an anti-doping advocate
Russia at the Olympics opening ceremony
PtG Comment 18.12.2020
CAS on Russia: WADA won the battle, but lost the power to push victory through
Alexander Lukashenko
PtG Comment 15.12.2020
Olympic finger-wagging at Europe’s last dictator
Photo by IOC/Ian Jones
PtG Comment 09.11.2020
To stand up for Olympic values it may be necessary to kneel as well
Nikki Dryden
PtG Comment 21.08.2020
Athletes should not be gagged in exchange for Olympic dream
Megan Rapinoe
PtG Comment 23.06.2020
Making a case for athlete advocacy: Humanitarians, Olympism and good governance
Naoko Imoto received the Olympic torch
PtG Comment 11.05.2020
A leaked list discloses how much cash the IOC paid for the 2016 Olympics in Rio
Alisher Usmanov and Thomas Bach
PtG Article 03.04.2020
How federations share the revenues from the Olympic Games
Lighting the olympic flame
PtG Comment 03.04.2020
IOC President holds on to power while federations face financial problems
Tokyo 2020 sign
PtG Comment 20.03.2020
Growing pressure as the IOC and Japan play for time
People protesting the olympics
PtG Comment 03.12.2019
NOlympics Anywhere: A transnational movement to stop the Olympic Games is gathering strength
Naomi Osaka
PtG Article 08.11.2019
Mixed-blood athletes challenge old myths in Japan
PtG Article 13.10.2019
Russian whistleblower: “The fight is not over yet”
Wrestlers
PtG Article 03.07.2019
Scandals expose widespread harassment in Japanese sport before the Olympics
PtG Comment 07.11.2018
Opposition to the Olympics in American cities
PtG Comment 24.10.2018
Hamburg’s bid for the 2024 Games: Political misconceptions of citizens’ concerns
Putin
PtG Comment 23.10.2018
Putin’s use of sporting events as a domestic policy tool
PtG Comment 08.10.2018
A cautious game: Protesting mega-events in Russia
PtG Comment 08.10.2018
Civil society, contestation, and the games
PtG Comment 16.03.2018
The Sochi Games was just a copy of the Moscow Games
PtG Comment 13.02.2018
Dancing on Ice: Russia, Hockey, and Soft Power
The Stepanovs and Hajo Seppelt
PtG Article 29.11.2017
The Stepanovs and Hajo Seppelt receive the Play the Game Award
Olympic stadium seen from the air
PtG Comment 18.12.2015
Permanent host cities – a sustainable future for the Olympic Games
Bobsleigh at Sochi 2014
PtG Comment 19.11.2015
After Sochi 2014: Costs and impacts of Russia’s Olympic Games
Runners at the London Olympics
PtG Article 03.04.2013
The London 2012 Olympics - a gender equality audit
Olympic rings
PtG Article 26.06.2007
The Olympic Games as a force for social change
Football
PtG Article 22.07.2003
The Dark Side of Australian Sport
Hockey
PtG Article 12.11.2002
The Russian Mafia and hockey
Footbal playern in Rwanda
PtG Article 14.11.2000
Sport in Development Countries - Who's in charge?