PtG Article 15.10.2019

Mega-events and human rights: Where do we draw the line?

The tentative opening up of football stadia to women in Iran for an international game against Cambodia on October 10 is only the start, FIFA’s head of sustainability & diversity said at Play the Game 2019.

In a session on mega-events, where FIFA’s record on a range of issues from the carbon footprint of the World Cup to human rights came under fire, Federico Addiechi said of Iran: “We’re not completely happy about the ending. For us, it’s not enough. It’s not about the FIFA World Cup qualifiers but about football across the country.”

Addiechi also said that the international governing body of football was looking into the recycling of artificial pitches, pledged that a carbon neutral World Cup would one day be staged, and listed the human rights issues that FIFA has addressed including sexual abuse in Afghanistan.

Human rights are part of the hosting agreement and therefore part of the contract to stage a FIFA World Cup, said Addiechi, who pointed out that labour rights have been included since November 2017.

2016: the year of change?

Gigi Alford, director of sports and human rights at the World Players Association, identified 2016 as the year that governing bodies began to change their approach to human rights and mega events.

She said: “Those awarded after this moment show a marked improvement. Those that were awarded before 2016 suffer from the same major crises. It’s not true across the board. What makes a difference is the level of engagement?”

“Different sports bodies are at different stages. Some are really embracing it, some are applying it to some extent but are not comfortable with other parts, while some have rejected it.”

On the same panel, Professor Andrew Zimbalist from Smith College in the USA looked at the changes implemented by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to their bidding processes to address not human rights but an alarming slide in potential hosts.

Two sets of IOC reforms, Agenda 2020 and the New Norm, were, said Zimbalist, a “response to new market conditions” but still failed to address a slide in the number of bidders. This has resulted in a shift away from a bidding process to what Zimbalist described as a “one to one conversation” between the IOC and potential hosts.

“They have now ended competitive bidding, but this was the model that the IOC relied upon for decades,” commented Zimbalist. “They have taken a process that was once public and made it private. At the end of the day, this last reform promised a lot but is really empty.”

Another spin-off from these reforms is that the Olympics are in a “moment of historic unpopularity,” according to Jonny Coleman, co-founder of NOlympics LA, which is a grassroots anti-Olympics movement launched in 2017 to address the negative impact of Los Angeles hosting the 2028 Olympics.

Coleman claims that the current crisis in Los Angeles, where he says there are an estimated 60,000 homeless people with three dying every day, has its origins in the city hosting the 1984 Olympics.

Hosting the Games again in nine years will “compromise civic resources for decades,” said Coleman, who added: “If you kick the Olympics out of LA, what will it look like? Will it go to an undemocratic country?”

Difficult places

Niels Nygaard, Vice President of the European Olympic Committees, pointed out that some states in the USA still had the death penalty as he addressed the pros and cons of staging mega-events in “difficult places.”

“Where do we draw the line?” asked Nygaard rhetorically. “As long as the IOC makes a decision in full transparency and decided by the majority, we have to respect that.”

Countries like Azerbaijan and Belarus took the opportunity to host the new European Games in 2015 and 2019 to be part of the “European family,” conceded Nygaard, but there was also a lack of bidders.

He admitted that taking a mega-event to a difficult place risks legitimising a country, which lacks human rights but stressed that this also opens up a dialogue and forces the country to open up.

If human rights are under attack, what is needed is an approach that offers a remedy said Mary Harvey, chief executive officer of the Centre for Sport & Human Rights, which looks to use collective action as a response.

Addiechi said that FIFA was providing a remedy through engagement and that the title of the session, ‘Duel or dialogue?’, was outdated. “The relevant question is how FIFA and other bodies make sure the right preparations are in place.”

Only time will tell what the impact of those preparations for future mega-events like the World Cup and the Olympics will have on human rights.

Other news from Play the Game 2019

PtG Article 20.02.2020
Massive backing from participants to the first Play the Game conference outside Europe
Erin Willson
PtG Article 25.10.2019
The struggle for safe sport in Canada: one step forward, two steps back
Anas Anas presenting at conference
PtG Article 24.10.2019
Sports betting: What are the odds on a fix?
Nikki Dryden
PtG Article 16.10.2019
Athlete activism: defending the right to protest
Conference speakers
PtG Article 16.10.2019
The great doping battle
Nancy Hogshead-Makar
PtG Article 16.10.2019
Nancy Hogshead-Makar receives the Play the Game Award 2019
PtG Article 16.10.2019
Play the Game 2019 on tour to USOPC training hub
PtG Article 16.10.2019
NCAA must strive to benefit student athletes
PtG Comment 16.10.2019
IAAF shares viewpoints on Semenya after Play the Game 2019 debate
PtG Comment 16.10.2019
Open letter to IOC President Thomas Bach from athlete organisations
PtG Article 15.10.2019
What it means to blow the whistle
PtG Article 15.10.2019
The role of team doctors in professional sport
PtG Article 15.10.2019
Tackling threats to grassroots sport
PtG Article 15.10.2019
Broken Trust premieres at Play the Game 2019
PtG Article 15.10.2019
The U.S. questions how to measure good governance in sport
PtG Article 15.10.2019
Whistleblowing: Minimising the risks
PtG Article 15.10.2019
Doping decisions: In pursuit of uniform sentencing
PtG Article 14.10.2019
Interview with David Howman
PtG Article 14.10.2019
Interview with Linda Helleland
PtG Article 14.10.2019
Athletes must be heard
PtG Article 14.10.2019
Good Governance: Just another buzz phrase?
PtG Article 14.10.2019
Will the Sports Governance Observer bring changes to world sport?
PtG Comment 14.10.2019
New standards of sports governance: When will sport join the modern world in embracing democracy?
PtG Comment 14.10.2019
Good governance – the new sport mantra
PtG Article 13.10.2019
Sport: A safe haven for athletes?
PtG Article 13.10.2019
Interview with Yuliya and Vitaly Stepanov
PtG Article 13.10.2019
Russian whistleblower: “The fight is not over yet”
PtG Article 13.10.2019
Athletes' voices: breakthrough or breakdown?
PtG Article 13.10.2019
Time’s up: Athlete power on the rise!
PtG Comment 13.10.2019
Athlete activism: An omen for sport in the 2020's?
Børn spiller fodbold
PtG Article 08.10.2019
The global challenge of growing sports

Related articles

PtG Article 12.01.2023
The expansion of Saudi investments in sport: From football to esport
Alex Schwacer walking
PtG Article 16.12.2022
Race walker Alex Schwazer continues his fight against sport's jurisprudence system
PtG Comment 19.11.2022
Football may unite the world, but FIFA works to divide it
PtG Article 27.10.2022
The Saudis in sport: Ambitions much larger than sportswashing
Mehboba Ahdyar
PtG Article 20.09.2022
New IOC human rights strategy brought to the test in negotiations with the Taliban regime
Canadas ungdomslandshold i ishockey
PtG Article 29.08.2022
Sexual abuse in sport: Canada could be a world leader in developing solutions
James M Dorsey at Play the Game 2022
PtG Article 27.07.2022
From sportswashing in autocracies to soft power in democracies 
Mikhail Zaleuski at Play the Game 2022
PtG Article 22.07.2022
Solidarity in sport: Athletes should speak up for democracy and against climate change
Panel
PtG Article 04.07.2022
Call for nuances in media reporting of the World Cup in Qatar
Friba Rezayee holder oplæg
PtG Article 30.06.2022
Afghanistan’s first female Olympian: IOC is funding the Taliban-controlled NOC in Kabul
Presentation at conference
PtG Article 28.06.2022
It is important that FIFA’s world cup in Qatar gets a human rights legacy
Panel at Play the Game 2022.
PtG Article 27.06.2022
Russian sanctions unlikely to herald a new era of accountability
Beijing 2022 opening ceremony
PtG Comment 08.02.2022
A modest but confident China on display at the 2022 Beijing Olympics opening ceremony
PtG Comment 19.01.2022
The political power of the Olympic opening ceremony: Lessons from Beijing and Sochi
Uyghurs demonstrate in Washington
PtG Article 14.10.2021
Beijing 2022: Olympic boycott battle over China’s ‘Genocide Games’
Basketball woman Mali
PtG Article 20.09.2021
Human Rights Watch: FIBA president should go after sexual abuse case in Mali
Khalida Popal
PtG Article 27.05.2021
Sexual abuse in football: Presidential predators and pedophile child molesters
PtG Comment 10.05.2021
Boycott Qatar: What are the chances?
Yulia and Vitaly Stepanov
PtG Article 28.04.2021
Whistleblowers call on the UN to close human rights gap in sport
Construction workers
PtG Comment 23.02.2021
The unpredictable financial costs of hosting the Olympic Games
Gabriella Battaini-Dragoni
PtG Article 17.02.2021
Human rights in sport rises to the top of the agenda in the Council of Europe
PtG Comment 13.01.2021
Egypt’s search for a fig leaf: It’s not the Handball World Championship
Russia at the Olympics opening ceremony
PtG Comment 18.12.2020
CAS on Russia: WADA won the battle, but lost the power to push victory through
Alexander Lukashenko
PtG Comment 15.12.2020
Olympic finger-wagging at Europe’s last dictator
Colin Kaepernick
PtG Comment 11.08.2020
Athletes’ gestures are protected by international human rights law
Protesters in Brazil
PtG Comment 31.12.2019
A decade that opened windows of democracy in sport
Putin holding the 2018 world cup trophy
PtG Article 29.11.2019
More – not less – democracy is often better for organising a World Cup
Formula 1 track
PtG Article 13.09.2019
Formula 1 does not seem to have a positive impact on host regions
Flag at opening ceremony
PtG Article 21.03.2019
Anti-Semitism in sport: Discrimination and death threats
Brazilian soccer players
PtG Comment 05.12.2018
The historical roots of the Brazilian 'demonstrations cup'
PtG Comment 07.11.2018
Opposition to the Olympics in American cities
PtG Comment 24.10.2018
Hamburg’s bid for the 2024 Games: Political misconceptions of citizens’ concerns
Putin
PtG Comment 23.10.2018
Putin’s use of sporting events as a domestic policy tool
PtG Comment 08.10.2018
A cautious game: Protesting mega-events in Russia
PtG Article 28.11.2017
Human rights, soft power and the legacy of mega-events
PtG Comment 13.08.2013
For your eyes only
Stray dogs
PtG Article 06.12.2011
Mega-event politics: Ukraine stops killing of stray dogs before EURO 2012
Football players
PtG Comment 23.03.2011
A Middle East Female Sports Revolution?
Olympic rings
PtG Article 26.06.2007
The Olympic Games as a force for social change
Football
PtG Article 22.07.2003
The Dark Side of Australian Sport