Indian sports ministry and IOC fight over government interference

14.05.2010

By Play the Game
Letters reveal that the IOC and the Indian Sports Ministry are squaring off over proposed term limits for Indian sports officials.

Earlier this month, Play the Game brought a story from insidethegames.biz, citing that the Indian sports ministry introduced a law limiting the number of terms Indian sports officials can be at the helm of the national sports bodies.

At that time, V.K Malhorta, vice-president of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA), claimed that they would take legal action against the decision and warned that India risked suspension from the IOC if the law was imposed. "The IOC and the OCA (Olympic Council of Asia) don't allow Government interference and may take action if they come to know this” he stated.

And it seems that Malhorta was right.

In a letter sent earlier this week to the Indian government, the IOC wrote that it is opposing the efforts by the government to impose term limits on sports officials. Both sides plan to meet in Lausanne soon to discuss the issue, according to letters.

Injeti Srinivas, joint secretary of Ministry if Youth Affairs & Sports, calls the IOC position “strange” in a letter dated Wednesday to IOC President Jacques Rogge.

“We are surprised, that in such a fundamental matter, as good democracy, and clean elections in the NOCs, you do not wish, to take any position, except to say, that no matter how unacceptable the situation, the national authorities, or courts of the country are not to look their way,” Srinivas wrote.

The IOC opposition to the government proposal is based on protecting the autonomy of NOCs. The IOC does not take issue with the principle of term limits. The IOC has its own term limits including a maximum presidential tenure of 12 years and age-limit of 70 years for IOC members.

“Our point is that such measures (which relate to internal operations of those organizations) must not be decided or imposed by law or an external body’s decision,” IOC NOC Relations Director Pere Miro wrote to the sports ministry on Monday. “But must be decided freely and democratically by the competent organs of those organisations, on a case-by-case basis, and this must be reflected in their respective statues/constitutions.

“This is our understanding of what autonomy of the Olympic and sports organisations means, and it is one of the basic principles of the Olympic Movement.”

The IOC, in its response, says government-imposed term limits could breach the Olympic Charter.


SOURCE: Aroundtherings.com

  • Kristen ., 14.05.2010 09:44:
     
    Great Article...

    Lessoning IOC influence anywhere is healthy for the World Sports system. The government of India has the right idea, which is forward thinking to assure a progressive sports system that represents the times in our ever developing world - assuring accountability and decreasing of monopolies which has paralyzed the Olympic Movement and positive growth and interest by youth participating in active sport.

    Hence the very reason for the progression and development of the XGames winter and summer are far more attractive for young women and men to participate. The IOC can't keep up... and out of touch with you and progressive in sport...

    I hope the India government is successful, and that other countries will follow their lead if (we) are to ensure a healthy sports system that is current and reflects societies developments and values universally.

    The Olympic Charter is out of date, and needs to be updated,on issues such as this and human rights and protections of athletes. It is absolutely ironic the IOC is quoting the possibility of "violating the Olympic Charter", when they have in the past several years themselves violated it on human rights, protection of women and gender in world sport -

    Again typical of the IOC to be hypocritical when it suits their agenda. I applaud the India government for taking such a progressive stance, it makes sense, it is healthy for sport, and a model suggestion which other governments should follow suit.

    The current model again, is unhealthy, breeds lacking accountability and monopolies by few and stagnant development, and not in the best interest of the system of sport which we are all part of.

    CHANGE IS HEALTHY -
Comment

* required field

*
*
*
What is three plus seven?
*

Guidelines for posting
Play the Game promotes an open debate on sport and sports politics and we strongly encourage everyone to participate in the discussions on playthegame.org. But please follow these simple guidelines when you write a post:

  1. Please be respectful - even if you disagree strongly with certain viewpoints. Slanderous or profane remarks will not be posted.
  2. Please keep to the subject. Spam or solicitations of any kind will not be posted.

Accept cookies

By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our cookie policy unless you have disabled them.