Streetfootballworld relaunches website
(22 December 2008)

VANOC draws on indigenous symbols but fails to support indigenous athletes
(18 December 2008)

AIBA passes judgements on 15 ethics cases
(17 December 2008)

IOC ranks last on accountability
(12 December 2008)

EOC honours Europe's last dictator
(11 December 2008)

Premier League wealth masks football league poverty
(11 December 2008)

First names confirmed for Play the Game 2009
(10 December 2008)

Play the Game 2009 Call for papers
(8 December 2008)

FIFA vice president in match fixing allegations
(5 December 2008)

Play the Game Home / News / Latest news / Press boycott o...

Send to a friend...


Press boycott of Australian cricket due to accreditation terms


18 November 2008


/upload/pictures/cricketbig.jpg
By Stine Alvad

The news agencies are boycotting the Australian cricket events starting this week with the New Zealand tour of Australia due to a dispute over terms of accreditation.

Cricket Australia has set limits to what can be published on websites that are not linked directly to an official newspaper or sports magazine. According to the International Herald Tribune, the Cricket Australia also reserves the right to forbid distribution of Cricket Australia coverage on any website that Cricket Australia finds objectionable.

The news agencies accuse the accreditation terms of not respecting editorial critique of the sport and the suspension of coverage comes as a direct result of these limitations.

“Reuters is regrettably unable to cover the upcoming cricket events in Australia, following unacceptable accreditation terms for journalists imposed by Cricket Australia”, said Christoph Pleitgen, Global Head of News Agency for Thomson Reuters.

 “As in previous instances, this decision compromises our ability to report independently and objectively, and comes at the expense of global fans and sponsors”, he adds, according to Sportscity.com

In the IHT, AP Associate General Counsel Dave Tomlin agrees on that point and says that the AP “can’t agree to allow any outside party, especially one we’re covering, to tell us where we can and can’t distribute our news reports.”

Related links: